On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:15:23AM -0600, Dan Carpenter wrote: > We dereferenced "node" in the error message after freeing it. Also > btrfs_panic() can return so we should return an error code instead of > continuing. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: in the first version I just deleted the kfree(). > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c > index 790f492..4da0865 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c > @@ -1239,10 +1239,11 @@ static int __must_check __add_reloc_root(struct btrfs_root *root) > node->bytenr, &node->rb_node); > spin_unlock(&rc->reloc_root_tree.lock); > if (rb_node) { > - kfree(node); > btrfs_panic(root->fs_info, -EEXIST, "Duplicate root found " > "for start=%llu while inserting into relocation " > "tree\n", node->bytenr); > + kfree(node); > + return -EEXIST; > } > > list_add_tail(&root->root_list, &rc->reloc_roots); I'm not sure why but it seems like this patch is wrapped. At first I thought it was thunderbird but then I opened it up and saved it from mutt and I got the same problem. I will fix it up, but you may want to check your mail client. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html