Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 04/20/2012 11:00 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
It's not simple however, so can anyone work out or remember wtf the code
should be doing ???
Huh.
The code was added by:
commit 26df6d13406d1a53b0bda08bd712f1924affd7cd
Author: hyc@xxxxxxxxx<hyc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Jun 22 10:14:49 2010 -0700
tty: Add EXTPROC support for LINEMODE
====
The code is now:
retval = copy_to_user(*b,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
n -= retval;
tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)& (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
tty->read_cnt -= n;
if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&& tty->icanon&& n == 1) {
if (!tty->read_cnt&& (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
n--;
}
====
n after "n -= retval" means number of successfully copied chars. So the
test "n == 1" along with "!tty->read_cnt" actually should ensure we
copied everything and that is exactly one char. Further we test if that
one is EOF. If so, ignore that char by pretending we copied nothing.
Correct.
However the implementation does not count with buffer wrapped like:
EOF..........................something
^----- tail
Here, the first call to copy_from_read_buf copies "something" and the
second one is to copy single EOF. But that would be ignored! Is this
expected?
Hmmm, probably not expected, no. The intent was to pass the EOF character
through if it's part of a non-empty input line. But if the EOF is the first
character on an input line, it should be treated as an EOF and no data
returned from the read.
So to fix the user buffer dereference, the following diff should help.
In any case the wrapped buffer is still to be fixed... (Or ignored.)
--- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c
@@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct *tty,
int retval;
size_t n;
unsigned long flags;
+ bool is_eof;
retval = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
@@ -1639,15 +1640,15 @@ static int copy_from_read_buf(struct tty_struct
*tty,
if (n) {
retval = copy_to_user(*b,
&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
n -= retval;
+ is_eof = n == 1&&
+ tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail] == EOF_CHAR(tty);
tty_audit_add_data(tty,&tty->read_buf[tty->read_tail], n);
spin_lock_irqsave(&tty->read_lock, flags);
tty->read_tail = (tty->read_tail + n)& (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE-1);
tty->read_cnt -= n;
/* Turn single EOF into zero-length read */
- if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&& tty->icanon&& n == 1) {
- if (!tty->read_cnt&& (*b)[n-1] == EOF_CHAR(tty))
- n--;
- }
+ if (L_EXTPROC(tty)&& tty->icanon&& is_eof&&
!tty->read_cnt)
+ n = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tty->read_lock, flags);
*b += n;
*nr -= n;
thanks,
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
