On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:40 -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:16:31 EST, Steven Rostedt said: > > > This is a bug in gcc that's fixed in 4.6 and beyond. I don't want to > > remove this warning because it will hide a real bug if page2 really does > > become uninitialized. If 4.6 gives a warning here, then I'll fix it. > > > > - void *page2; > > > + void *uninitialized_var(page2); > > How would you feel about this? > > - void *page2; > + void *page2; /* gcc 4.5 bug causes incorrect "uninitialized" warning */ > > or something similar? /* if you get a warning here, upgrade your gcc to 4.6 */ -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
