On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 12:55:52PM +0100, walter harms wrote: > numerical this is ok, but ... > maybe it is better to cap the chan->n_subbufs at a useful number ? We considered this question already earlier in the thread. > The user can still allocate an insane number of bytes. > Restricting subbuf_size*n_subbufs seems more logical (otherwise is this a real problem ?) > Yes. It is a real problem. regards, dan carpenter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
