The intent here was to test that the flag was clear but the '!' has
higher precedence than the '&'. I2C_M_RD is 0x1 so the current code is
equivalent to "&& (!sgs[i].flags) ..."
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
index 02efd94..e693913 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/az6007.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int az6007_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
addr = msgs[i].addr << 1;
if (((i + 1) < num)
&& (msgs[i].len == 1)
- && (!msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ && (!(msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD))
&& (msgs[i + 1].flags & I2C_M_RD)
&& (msgs[i].addr == msgs[i + 1].addr)) {
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
