On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:26:41AM +0100, walter harms wrote: > >> perhaps it is more useful to do it in the check above ? > > > > It looks like the check is correct but we need to shift all the > > values by one. Again, I don't have this hardware, I'm just going by > > the context. > > > I do not have the hardware either so this is pure theoretical. > > Access to the data field depends on the value of dvbs2_noise_reading/tmp > even when the data are reasonable like 50/100 snr_reading would become 0 > and the index suddenly is -1. > It's a good point. I will redo the patch. regards, dan carpenter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
