On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 32 bit systems num_aces * sizeof(struct cifs_ace *) could overflow
> leading to a smaller ppace buffer than we expected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> index 72ddf23..c1b2544 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> @@ -909,6 +909,8 @@ static void parse_dacl(struct cifs_acl *pdacl, char *end_of_acl,
> umode_t group_mask = S_IRWXG;
> umode_t other_mask = S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO;
>
> + if (num_aces > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct cifs_ace *))
Should an error/warning (like cifs client can't handle these many aces or
possible erroneous number of aces sent by server etc.) be logged before
returning?
> + return;
> ppace = kmalloc(num_aces * sizeof(struct cifs_ace *),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ppace) {
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
