Re: [patch] cifs: integer overflow in parse_dacl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:46:27 +0300
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 32 bit systems num_aces * sizeof(struct cifs_ace *) could overflow
> leading to a smaller ppace buffer than we expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> index 72ddf23..c1b2544 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsacl.c
> @@ -909,6 +909,8 @@ static void parse_dacl(struct cifs_acl *pdacl, char *end_of_acl,
>  		umode_t group_mask = S_IRWXG;
>  		umode_t other_mask = S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | S_IRWXO;
>  
> +		if (num_aces > ULONG_MAX / sizeof(struct cifs_ace *))
> +			return;
>  		ppace = kmalloc(num_aces * sizeof(struct cifs_ace *),
>  				GFP_KERNEL);
>  		if (!ppace) {


Looks plausible. This function could use some work. I'm not sure why
num_aces is signed here too...

The first arg to kmalloc is a size_t. Does that boil down to an unsigned
long on all arches?

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux