[patch -next] x86: dubious one-bit signed bitfields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It doesn't cause any runtime problems in this case, but bitfields should
be unsigned.  This file gets included a lot so it generates thousands of
Sparse warnings about dubious one-bit signed bitfields.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
index 0ecd1a9..114dca1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ struct thread_info {
 						*/
 	__u8			supervisor_stack[0];
 #endif
-	int			sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
-	int			uaccess_err:1;	/* uaccess failed */
+	unsigned int		sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
+	unsigned int		uaccess_err:1;	/* uaccess failed */
 };
 
 #define INIT_THREAD_INFO(tsk)			\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux