I'm not sure how to proceed, since I originally sent 3 patches, all with the same problem. I send another single patch that fixed the problems with nicer names than r and r1. Should I send another single patch with Manuel's solution? Or does Manuel want to do that? julia On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:47:25PM +0100, Girdwood, Liam wrote: > > > From 940e38b3f0beff6fcd8f62f627dce622e9ca0e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:45:12 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: au1x: fix error paths in ac97c/i2cs probe callbacks. > > > > > > add iounmap() and release the correct mem resource. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxx> > > ...but since it was buried in the middle of the e-mail please resend > with Liam's ack for application. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
