Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 11:01 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:42:03AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 10:25 +0300, Dan Carpenter a écrit : > > > Crap. Sorry, I shouldn't have sent that. We shouldn't return the > > > freed "n" here. I'll send a v2 shortly. > > > > Also, dont forget to say its a patch for net-next-2.6 > > If you're using linux-next, is there a way to tell which tree a > patch came from? Obviously in this case it's core networking, but > in other cases how does that work? In this particular case, David will know for sure since patch is very recent, but I wanted to make a general advice. Keep in mind David has to review dozens of patches _per_ day, so netdev related patches need some extra cooperation from submitters to help the maintainer. This extra cooperation means to test the patch on either net-next-2.6 or net-2.6 tree ;) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
