Am 04.06.2011 15:36, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Em 26-05-2011 08:16, Andreas Oberritter escreveu:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> On 05/26/2011 10:44 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>>> If the tvp->cmd == DTV_MAX_COMMAND then we read past the end of the
>>> array.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>>> index 9827804..607e293 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>>> @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static void dtv_property_dump(struct dtv_property *tvp)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>>
>>> - if (tvp->cmd <= 0 || tvp->cmd > DTV_MAX_COMMAND) {
>>> + if (tvp->cmd <= 0 || tvp->cmd >= DTV_MAX_COMMAND) {
>>> printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: tvp.cmd = 0x%08x undefined\n",
>>> __func__, tvp->cmd);
>>> return;
>>
>> thanks for spotting this, but this fixes the wrong end. This does not need to
>> be applied to kernels older than 2.6.40.
>>
>> From 6d8588a4546fd4df717ca61450f99fb9c1b13a5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:54:14 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] DVB: dvb_frontend: fix dtv_property_dump for DTV_DVBT2_PLP_ID
>>
>> - Add missing entry to array "dtv_cmds".
>> - Set array size to DTV_MAX_COMMAND + 1 to avoid future off-by-ones.
>
> Patchwork.kernel.org is not reliable at all. It missed this entire thread.
>
> Andreas patch is the right thing to do.
>
> Thank you both for reporting and fixing this issue. I'm applying the
> patch right now.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <obi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>> index 9827804..bed7bfe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c
>> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int dvb_frontend_clear_cache(struct dvb_frontend *fe)
>> .buffer = b \
>> }
>>
>> -static struct dtv_cmds_h dtv_cmds[] = {
>> +static struct dtv_cmds_h dtv_cmds[DTV_MAX_COMMAND + 1] = {
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_TUNE, 1, 0),
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_CLEAR, 1, 0),
>>
>> @@ -966,6 +966,7 @@ static struct dtv_cmds_h dtv_cmds[] = {
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_ISDBT_LAYERC_TIME_INTERLEAVING, 0, 0),
>>
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_ISDBS_TS_ID, 1, 0),
>> + _DTV_CMD(DTV_DVBT2_PLP_ID, 1, 0),
>>
>> /* Get */
>> _DTV_CMD(DTV_DISEQC_SLAVE_REPLY, 0, 1),
>
>
Do you really want a fixed size array ?
perhaps it is better to leave it struct dtv_cmds_h dtv_cmds[]
and use ARRAY_SIZE(dtv_cmds) instead of DTV_MAX_COMMAND ?
i do not see any use beyond dtv_property_dump().
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
