Re: [patch] ocfs2: checking the wrong variable in ocfs2_move_extent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:56:31PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> "new_phys_cpos" is always a valid pointer here.
> ocfs2_probe_alloc_group() allocates "*new_phys_cpos".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>

This patch is now in the 'fixes' branch of ocfs2.git.

Joel

> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
> index 4c54884..f3eb060 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c
> @@ -747,7 +747,7 @@ static int ocfs2_move_extent(struct ocfs2_move_extents_context *context,
>  	 */
>  	ocfs2_probe_alloc_group(inode, gd_bh, &goal_bit, len, move_max_hop,
>  				new_phys_cpos);
> -	if (!new_phys_cpos) {
> +	if (!*new_phys_cpos) {
>  		ret = -ENOSPC;
>  		goto out_commit;
>  	}

-- 

"If the human brain were so simple we could understand it, we would
 be so simple that we could not."
	- W. A. Clouston

			http://www.jlbec.org/
			jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux