Re: [PATCH] x86: page: get_order() optimization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 23/03/2011 at 11:07 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Ok, that's certainly a nice optimization.

Thanks, I rewrote patch according to your observations.

> One detail: in many cases 'size' is a constant. Have you checked recent GCC, 
> does it turn the generic version of get_order() into a loop even for constants, 
> or is it able does it perhaps recognize the pattern and precompute the result?

Yes, gcc precomputes the result, so I added case for constants.

> With no #ifdefs in get_order().

And removed #ifdefs from get_order().

-- 
Thanks,

Maksym Planeta

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux