Re: [patch 2/2] staging: ath6kl: buffer overflow in SEND_FRAME ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Vipin Mehta <vmehta@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Acked-by: Vipin Mehta <vipin.mehta@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Greg, Joe is not sure if these patches will be applied as-is and his
> cleanup depends on code being static, I think they would be there is a
> chance you might muck them a bit and this would break any cleanup
> work. Will these patches be merged as-is, can Joe for example git am
> these into his tree as-is and work off of the assumption that they
> will reflect the top of staging-next + these patches?

I already answered Joe about this yesterday, was that response somehow
not sufficient?

thanks,

greg "tired of repeating myself" k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux