On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:16 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > But why did you call the label differently? :) > > Because out is already used in this case, and I didn't want to change all > of the other occurrences of nla_put_failure. It's a bit sloppy though, > because this code is the actual nla_put_failure. I can change it if you > prefer. Oh, and I could've seen that from the patch itself too, I just missed it, sorry. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
