Re: [patch -next] pch_can: off by one bugs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:41 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
This fix does not look correct too me.
I agree with Wolfgang's comments.

Dan
Thank you for your report.
I will post the patch by this week.

Thanks,
---
Tomoya MORINAGA
OKI SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <socketcan-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Tomoya MORINAGA" <tomoya-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: [patch -next] pch_can: off by one bugs


Hello,

On 12/20/2010 10:26 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
priv->tx_enable[] has PCH_TX_OBJ_END elements so this code is
reading and writing one past the end of the array.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
index 8d45fdd..b2c1292 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static int pch_can_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
 pch_can_set_int_enables(priv, PCH_CAN_DISABLE);

 /* Save Tx buffer enable state */
- for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
+ for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
 priv->tx_enable[i] = pch_can_get_rxtx_ir(priv, i, PCH_TX_IFREG);

 /* Disable all Transmit buffers */
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static int pch_can_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 pch_can_set_optmode(priv);

 /* Enabling the transmit buffer. */
- for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
+ for (i = PCH_TX_OBJ_START; i < PCH_TX_OBJ_END; i++)
 pch_can_set_rxtx(priv, i, priv->tx_enable[i], PCH_TX_IFREG);

 /* Configuring the receive buffer and enabling them. */


This fix does not look correct too me. There are much more loop using
"i <= PCH_TX_OBJ_END" and the message numbering is from 1..32. Therefore
using "priv->tx_enable[i - 1]" seems more appropriate to me. Tomaya,
could you please check.

Thanks,

Wolfgang.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux