On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:37:48PM +0100, David Chosrova wrote: > Hello, > > In this patch I have removed the #ifdef ENABLE_DOT11D. > Cool man. Looks good. There are several places where ENABLE_DOT11D is still there in the comments. Can do a: grep ENABLE_DOT11D drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ -R and remove all those? Then add an: Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> When people apply patches they try to automate the process. They have scripts that automatically take an email and creates a kernel patch. So choose a good subject and write a patch description. I would normally write this: Subject: [patch] Staging: rtl8192u: remove dead code to disable dot11d This patch removes all the ENABLE_DOT11D ifdefs. It's always enabled for this driver. DOT11D has to do with regulatory domains. What prompted this patch was a warning message in Sparse: drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c:247:1: warning: "eqMacAddr" redefined in file included from drivers/staging/rtl8192u/:81:81: drivers/staging/rtl8192u/dot11d.h:35:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition Now there are no ifdefs around dot11d.h it made no sense to have this second definition, so I removed that macro as well. --- Edit that however you want. That's just an idea. Don't put the "Hello etc" into the message because Greg will have to strip those bits out of the patch description by hand. After the Signed-off-by: line put three dashes "---". Things below that line get stripped out of the patch description. That's where you can put the "Compile tested." or "Feedback requested" stuff if you want. Send your email to: gregkh@xxxxxxx CC these addresses: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, error27@xxxxxxxxx, andreamrl@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
