RE: [patch v2] dca: remove unneeded NULL check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The return here doesn't release the locks or re-enable IRQs.  But as
> Andrew Morton points out, domain is never NULL.  list_first_entry()
> essentially never returns NULL and also we already verified that the
> list is not empty.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dca/dca-core.c b/drivers/dca/dca-core.c index
> b98c676..c461eda 100644
> --- a/drivers/dca/dca-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dca/dca-core.c
> @@ -110,8 +110,6 @@ static void unregister_dca_providers(void)
> 
>  	/* at this point only one domain in the list is expected */
>  	domain = list_first_entry(&dca_domains, struct dca_domain, node);
> -	if (!domain)
> -		return;
> 
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(dca, _dca, &domain->dca_providers, node) {
>  		list_del(&dca->node);

Acked-by: Maciej Sosnowski <maciej.sosnowski@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux