Julia Lawall wrote: > These patches convert a sequence of kmalloc and memcpy to use kasprintf > instead. Aren't these patches just a more convoluted way of doing a kstrdup? I would imagine that a kasprintf would make more sense when the format string is more complex than "%s", or am I missing something? -- Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com "The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
