Re: [patch 1/2] Staging: intel_sst: return -EFAULT if copy_to_user() fails

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:53:57AM +0530, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> > @@ -938,7 +940,7 @@ long intel_sst_ioctl(struct file *file_ptr, unsigned int cmd,
> > unsigned long arg)
> >  		retval = copy_to_user((struct snd_sst_vol *)arg,
> >  						&get_vol, sizeof(get_vol));
> >  		if (retval) {
> > -			retval = -EIO;
> > +			retval = -EFAULT;
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> >  		/*sst_print_get_vol_info(str_id, &get_vol);*/
> Since retval is not used and value assigned is supposed to be -EFAULT,
> how about this?
> 	if(copy_to_user())
> 			return -EIO;
> 

No. No.  retval is used.  We can't return directly because we need to
call unlock_kernel().

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux