On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 04:15:55PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 13:00 +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > ...it's not clear to me that this change is an improvement - it'll make > > the driver more fragile in the face of errors, I don't see a benefit in > > refusing to register the variant for one bus if the other fails? > I tried to implement your variant with depca driver in past, but it was > rejected by David Miller: > http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2010/07/12/9 I disagree with David here, and in any case if you're going to make a style change like this they really ought to be applied over all drivers rather than just a few individual ones. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
