From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:37:07 +0200 (CEST) > This code does not call deinit_card(card); in an error case, as done in > other error-handling code in the same function. But actually, the called > function init_sram can only return 0, so there is no need for the error > check at all. > > init_sram is also given a void return type, and its single return statement > at the end of the function is dropped. > > A simplified version of the sematic match that finds this problem is as > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) ... > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Applied, thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
