Extend the error handling code with operations found in other nearby error handling code A simplified version of the sematic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @r exists@ @r@ statement S1,S2,S3; constant C1,C2,C3; @@ *if (...) {... S1 return -C1;} ... *if (...) {... when != S1 return -C2;} ... *if (...) {... S1 return -C3;} // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> --- This is only a suggestion. All of the other ways out of this function call these two functions. But I don't understand the code well enough to know why, or whether there is a reason not to do it in this case. drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c index bced9b2..cfe5978 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c @@ -3258,6 +3258,8 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_and_relocate(struct drm_gem_object *obj, (int) reloc->offset, reloc->read_domains, reloc->write_domain); + drm_gem_object_unreference(target_obj); + i915_gem_object_unpin(obj); return -EINVAL; } if (reloc->write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU || -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
