On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:07:26 -0700, matt mooney wrote: > On 09:29 Sun 26 Sep , Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:12:17 -0700, matt mooney wrote: > > > Sam had implemented these newer style flag variables a while back as an > > > eloquent way of handling conditional flags. A lot of newer (and some older) > > > modules and subsystems were using them already, so to provide uniformity and for > > > an eventual removal of the deprecated flags, I converted all remaining instances > > > to the newer style. (IMHO, I think it flows better with the way the rest of the > > > build system works.) > > > > Fine with me. What's the planned merge path for this patch? Will you > > push all the patches upstream yourself, or do you expect me to pick > > this one? > > I was hoping subsystem maintainers would pick them up, but a lot of the patches > have been acked without being applied. My new plan is to have the unapplied ones > go through the kbuild tree. So you can either pick it up or just ack it. I've picked the patch, it's now in my i2c tree, scheduled for merge in 2.6.37. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
