From: "Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:57:46 -0700 > I've taken up your suggestions and implemented them (roughly) as > suggested below. After looking at the code I had to agree that it > would be very confusing for a user to set new ring parameters, have > the call partially succeed but get no error and then look at the > parameters again and not see what he expected. Now the code will do > as suggested and just unwind all prior allocations and return an > error if the new ring sizing didn't work. The user will be left > with the prior ring size allocations which is probably what he would > expect. > > The patch is going to be posted internally and after it goes through > our review process it will be posted to netdev. Thanks for doing this work Greg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
