[PATCH] staging: solo6010: fix signess bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



video_nr is unsigned, so check video_nr >= 0 doesn't make sense.
The only "negative" value may be -1, so explicitly check for it.

Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Compile tested.

 drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2-enc.c |    2 +-
 drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2.c     |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2-enc.c b/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2-enc.c
index f114b4b..bbf3d9c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2-enc.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2-enc.c
@@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@ static struct solo_enc_dev *solo_enc_alloc(struct solo6010_dev *solo_dev, u8 ch)
 		 "%s-enc (%i/%i)", SOLO6010_NAME, solo_dev->vfd->num,
 		 solo_enc->vfd->num);
 
-	if (video_nr >= 0)
+	if (video_nr != -1)
 		video_nr++;
 
 	spin_lock_init(&solo_enc->lock);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2.c b/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2.c
index 9537cc6..9731fa0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/solo6x10/solo6010-v4l2.c
@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ int solo_v4l2_init(struct solo6010_dev *solo_dev)
 	snprintf(solo_dev->vfd->name, sizeof(solo_dev->vfd->name), "%s (%i)",
 		 SOLO6010_NAME, solo_dev->vfd->num);
 
-	if (video_nr >= 0)
+	if (video_nr != -1)
 		video_nr++;
 
 	dev_info(&solo_dev->pdev->dev, "Display as /dev/video%d with "
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux