Re: [PATCH 13/14] mm: mempolicy: Check return code of check_range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:02 -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > > From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > Function check_range may return ERR_PTR(...). Check for it.
> > 
> > When happen this issue?
> > 
> > afaik, check_range return error when following condition.
> >  1) mm->mmap->vm_start argument is incorrect
> >  2) don't have neigher MPOL_MF_STATS, MPOL_MF_MOVE and MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> > 
> > I think both case is not happen in real. Am I overlooking anything?
> > 
> 
> There's no reason not to check the return value of a function when the 
> implementation of either could change at any time.  migrate_to_node() is 
> certainly not in any fastpath where we can't sacrifice a branch for more 
> robust code.

Agreed, if you know that the caller must check input data and must not
check return code, it's better to make this function return void.

-- 
Vasiliy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux