The current code tests the gpio_vid0 field twice. Test the gpio_vid1 fields in place of the second gpio_vid0 test. The sematic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @expression@ expression E; @@ ( * E || ... || E | * E && ... && E ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> --- This is a guess as to what the code should be. drivers/regulator/max8952.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8952.c b/drivers/regulator/max8952.c index f2af0b1..7bf63f4 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/max8952.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/max8952.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static int max8952_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, u8 vid = -1, i; if (!gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid0) || - !gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid0)) { + !gpio_is_valid(max8952->pdata->gpio_vid1)) { /* DVS not supported */ return -EPERM; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
