On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:46:13AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > This seems a bit ugly to me, since it exposes the implementation of the > list abstraction. What about the following: Actually, we're going to go back to the original list_for_each() and list_entry() version. It's a well understood idiom. We're also going to re-audit the rest of the patch that changed list_for_each() to list_for_each_entry(), just in case we missed another semantic error. Joel -- Life's Little Instruction Book #30 "Never buy a house without a fireplace." Joel Becker Consulting Software Developer Oracle E-mail: joel.becker@xxxxxxxxxx Phone: (650) 506-8127 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
