Re: [patch 2/2] qlcnic: using too much stack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:39:06 -0700

> On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 20:31 -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
>> On Aug 10, 2010, at 7:33 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 18:43 -0700, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:
>> >> Your patch is fine except that the preferred way is to use kzalloc over kaclloc. kzalloc does not need that extra
>> >> argument that you are passing to kcalloc.
>> > You probably meant to write "my preferred way"
>> > as the kcalloc to "kzalloc with a multiply"
>> > ratio is pretty high.
>> I was suggesting based on the following:
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/147014/
> 
> Note that article suggests kzalloc for allocating
> a single zeroed object.
> 
> kcalloc is used for multiple zeroed objects and
> protects against oversized allocations.

Agreed, kcalloc should be used here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux