On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 13:26 -0700, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> > > Outdent the code following the if. > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @r disable braces4@ > position p1,p2; > statement S1,S2; > @@ > > ( > if (...) { ... } > | > if (...) S1@p1 S2@p2 > ) > > @script:python@ > p1 << r.p1; > p2 << r.p2; > @@ > > if (p1[0].column == p2[0].column): > cocci.print_main("branch",p1) > cocci.print_secs("after",p2) > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Acked-by: Eilon Greenstein <eilong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > This patch doesn't change the semantics of the code. But it might not be > what is intended. This is indeed just bad alignment, thanks for the fix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
