2010-08-06 (금), 15:37 +0200, Tejun Heo: > Hello, > Hi, > On 08/06/2010 03:23 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Sure. :-) > > Although I'm not sure that it is really needed, if so I'll do that. > > Well, the whole __percpu markup thing is to detect misuse of percpu > pointers. I think it would definitely be better to have the sanity > check for UP code too. It's not like it's gonna cost any runtime > overhead and all the needed pieces are already there. > > Thanks. > I see. Thanks for the comments. -- Regards, Namhyung Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
