Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:12:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> void __kprobes kretprobe_hash_unlock(struct task_struct *tsk,
>> unsigned long *flags)
>> +__releases(hlisk_lock)
>
> You surely meant hlist_lock, didn't you?
>
>> {
>> unsigned long hash = hash_ptr(tsk, KPROBE_HASH_BITS);
>> spinlock_t *hlist_lock;
>> @@ -859,6 +862,7 @@ void __kprobes kretprobe_hash_unlock(struct task_struct *tsk,
>>
>> static void __kprobes kretprobe_table_unlock(unsigned long hash,
>> unsigned long *flags)
>> +__releases(hlisk_lock)
> ^^^^^^
>> {
>> spinlock_t *hlist_lock = kretprobe_table_lock_ptr(hash);
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(hlist_lock, *flags);
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
Oops, right...
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Research Dept.
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
