在 2010年7月18日 下午9:57,Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@xxxxxxxxx> 写道: > Sorry to resend this patch. For the 2nd patch should > be applied after this patch, I just send them together. > > Following is the explanation of the patch: > The comment for struct shrinker in include/linux/mm.h says > "shrink...It should return the number of objects which remain in the > cache." > Please notice the word "remain". > > In fs/mbcache.h, mb_cache_shrink_fn is used as the shrink function: > static struct shrinker mb_cache_shrinker = { > .shrink = mb_cache_shrink_fn, > .seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS, > }; > In mb_cache_shrink_fn, the return value for nr_to_scan > 0 is the > number of mb_cache_entry before shrink operation. It may because the > memory usage for mbcache is low, so the effect is not so obvious. > > Per Eric Sandeen, we should do the counting only once. > Per Christoph Hellwig, we should use list_for_each_entry instead of > list_for_each here. > > Following patch is against 2.6.35-rc4. Please check it. > > Sorry, made a typo. It's against 2.6.35-rc5. -- Thanks and Best Regards, shenghui -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html