On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 20:16 +0400, Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> The code checks 'davinci_vc' after kzalloc() and do not checks
> 'davinci_vcif_dev' that kzalloc() result is assigned to. It seems that
> it is a typo (autocompletion?).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-vcif.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-vcif.c b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-vcif.c
> index 9aa980d..4867853 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-vcif.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/davinci/davinci-vcif.c
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int davinci_vcif_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> int ret;
>
> davinci_vcif_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct davinci_vcif_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!davinci_vc) {
> + if (!davinci_vcif_dev) {
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
> "could not allocate memory for private data\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
13,14 & 15
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
