Hi,
On Wednesday 07 July 2010 13:04:36 Michal Marek wrote:
> On 3.7.2010 21:49, Nicolas Palix wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday 03 July 2010 17:20:34 Kulikov Vasiliy wrote:
> >> Use $KBUILD_EXTMOD instead of $srctree when the latter is not null
> >> to use make M=somedir.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> scripts/coccicheck | 8 +++++++-
> >> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
> >> index b8bcf1f..7d66a55 100755
> >> --- a/scripts/coccicheck
> >> +++ b/scripts/coccicheck
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
> >> #!/bin/sh
> >>
> >> +if [ -n "$KBUILD_EXTMOD" ]; then
> >> + CHECK_DIR="$KBUILD_EXTMOD"
> >> +else
> >> + CHECK_DIR="$srctree"
> >> +fi
> >> +
> >> SPATCH="`which ${SPATCH:=spatch}`"
> >>
> >> if [ "$C" = "1" -o "$C" = "2" ]; then
> >> @@ -64,7 +70,7 @@ coccinelle () {
> >> echo ' http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/'
> >> echo ''
> >>
> >> - $SPATCH -D $MODE $FLAGS -sp_file $COCCI $OPT -dir $srctree || exit 1
> >> + $SPATCH -D $MODE $FLAGS -sp_file $COCCI $OPT -dir $CHECK_DIR || exit 1
> >> else
> >> $SPATCH -D $MODE $FLAGS -sp_file $COCCI $OPT $OPTIONS || exit 1
> >> fi
> >>
> >
> > In doing so, the output of the patch mode will produce patches relative to $KBUILD_EXTMOD.
> > I am not sure of what most of developers want but if the patches must be relative to
> > the Linux kernel root, the following patch must be used.
>
> If you are checking your out-of-tree module, then you're probably not
> going to send the resulting patch to lkml.
>
Indeed. I thus acked the original patch last Monday [1].
Thanks.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/5/136
> Michal
>
--
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
Tel: (+33) 6 81 07 91 72
Web: http://www.diku.dk/~npalix/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
