On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 06:16:55PM +0200, Joe Eloff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have searched for results on this and most things I find is that it > > must be dropped. > > > > You mean something like: > > extern int foo = 0; > > initializing an extern doesn't make sense. It doesn't matter what you > initialize it to. Gcc should warn about this. The initialization should > go where the actual variable is declared. > > If that doesn't answer your question, can you send some sample code > that causes the error? For what it is worth, I didn't find anything with the following semantic match: @@ type T; identifier x; expression E; @@ * extern T x = E; This, if there actually is such a thing, I would be interested to know about it. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
