Hi, On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 17:15 +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote: > + echo ' The semantic patch that makes this change is available' > + echo " in $FILE." > + echo '' > + echo ' More information about semantic patching is available at' > + echo ' http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/' > + echo '' > + > + $SPATCH -D $MODE -very_quiet -sp_file $COCCI $OPT -dir $DIR Here I've got output: /usr/lib/coccinelle/spatch: unknown option `-very_quiet'. Usage: spatch -sp_file <SP> <infile> [-o <outfile>] [-iso_file <iso>] [options] Options are: [...] I use ubuntu Lucid 10.04 as said in Documentation/coccinelle.txt. $ LANG=C apt-cache policy coccinelle [...] Installed: 0.2.0.deb-1ubuntu2 [...] If I delete -very_quiet then It runs OK, but output is not ommited: init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/min_addr.c HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/proc.c HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/keyring.c HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/gc.c HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/process_keys.c HANDLING: /home/vasya/dev/linux-next/security/keys/request_key_auth.c [...] > +if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then > + for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do > + coccinelle $f $srctree; > + done > +else > + coccinelle $COCCI $srctree > +fi I think it is more usefull to use $M instead of $srctree to run simple 'make coccicheck'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
