Hi, on 2010-6-28 19:17, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The break was in front of the "nr = i" assignment so that was never hit. This bug has been fixed a month ago, and the patch has been merged into the btrfs-unstable tree. http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=127434036913484&w=2 Thanks Miao > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > index 0d1d966..ceb8ad2 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c > @@ -3453,8 +3453,8 @@ int btrfs_insert_some_items(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { > if (total_size + data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item) > > BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(root)) { > - break; > nr = i; > + break; > } > total_data += data_size[i]; > total_size += data_size[i] + sizeof(struct btrfs_item); > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
