Dan Carpenter schrieb:
> If oui were a null variable then vic_provinfo_alloc() would leak memory.
> But this function is only called from one place and oui is not null so
> I removed the check.
>
> I also moved the memory allocation down a line so it was easier to spot.
> (No one ever reads variable declarations).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/enic/vnic_vic.c b/drivers/net/enic/vnic_vic.c
> index d769772..0a35085 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/enic/vnic_vic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/enic/vnic_vic.c
> @@ -25,9 +25,10 @@
>
> struct vic_provinfo *vic_provinfo_alloc(gfp_t flags, u8 *oui, u8 type)
> {
> - struct vic_provinfo *vp = kzalloc(VIC_PROVINFO_MAX_DATA, flags);
> + struct vic_provinfo *vp;
>
> - if (!vp || !oui)
> + vp = kzalloc(VIC_PROVINFO_MAX_DATA, flags);
> + if (!vp)
> return NULL;
>
> memcpy(vp->oui, oui, sizeof(vp->oui));
> --
This looks like memdup() ?
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
