Le dimanche 30 mai 2010 à 22:50 +0200, Julia Lawall a écrit : > I think the proposed patch does not work, because the for loop overwrites > p. That use of p looks like it is completely local to the for loop, so > perhaps a new variable p1 could be added to be used there? Please do so. I just wanted to tell you changing GFP_KERNEL to GFP_ATOMIC is not an appropriate way to solve this kind of problems. My patch was to get an idea, not a full and tested patch :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
