On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:07:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > Why are "readl"s protected by spinlock anyway ? Can't we just move the locking > past the code above ? Good question - and there seems to be a deadlock waiting to happen - sa1111_wake() re-takes the same lock. I think we should kill all the spinlock in sa1111_resume(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
