From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> Add a spin_unlock missing on the error path. Unlock as in the other code that leads to the leave label. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression E1; @@ * spin_lock(E1,...); <+... when != E1 if (...) { ... when != E1 * return ...; } ...+> * spin_unlock(E1,...); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> --- fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c index 6b5a492..2ccad86 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmdomain.c @@ -1709,6 +1709,7 @@ retry: } if (dlm_protocol_compare(&dlm->fs_locking_proto, fs_proto)) { + spin_unlock(&dlm_domain_lock); mlog(ML_ERROR, "Requested locking protocol version is not " "compatible with already registered domain " -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html