Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We already dereferenced uaddr towards the start of the function when we > checked that "uaddr->sa_family != AF_CAIF". Both the check here and the > earlier check were added in bece7b2398d0: "caif: Rewritten socket > implementation". Before that patch, we assumed that we recieved a valid > pointer for uaddr, and based on that, I have removed this check. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks Looks good, Acked-by: Sjur Braendeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html