"phyinfo" can never be null here because we assigned it an address, so I
removed both the assert and the second check inside the if statement. I
removed the "phyinfo->phy_layer != NULL" check as well because that was
asserted earlier.
Walter Harms suggested I move the "phyinfo->phy_ref_count++;" outside
the if condition for readability, so I have done that.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
---
The original code increments phyinfo->phy_ref_count++ even if
phyinfo->phy_layer->modemcmd is NULL. I kept it the same in my code,
but maybe I should change that?
v2: Removed an assert. Moved the increment outside the if condition.
diff --git a/net/caif/cfcnfg.c b/net/caif/cfcnfg.c
index df43f26..7c81974 100644
--- a/net/caif/cfcnfg.c
+++ b/net/caif/cfcnfg.c
@@ -308,19 +308,15 @@ cfcnfg_linkup_rsp(struct cflayer *layer, u8 channel_id, enum cfctrl_srv serv,
caif_assert(cnfg != NULL);
caif_assert(phyid != 0);
phyinfo = &cnfg->phy_layers[phyid];
- caif_assert(phyinfo != NULL);
caif_assert(phyinfo->id == phyid);
caif_assert(phyinfo->phy_layer != NULL);
caif_assert(phyinfo->phy_layer->id == phyid);
- if (phyinfo != NULL &&
- phyinfo->phy_ref_count++ == 0 &&
- phyinfo->phy_layer != NULL &&
+ phyinfo->phy_ref_count++;
+ if (phyinfo->phy_ref_count == 1 &&
phyinfo->phy_layer->modemcmd != NULL) {
- caif_assert(phyinfo->phy_layer->id == phyid);
phyinfo->phy_layer->modemcmd(phyinfo->phy_layer,
_CAIF_MODEMCMD_PHYIF_USEFULL);
-
}
adapt_layer->id = channel_id;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
