Re: [patch] trace: find the correct ftrace event

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 16:19 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The original code doesn't work because "call" is never NULL there.

A one line change would have done the same ;-)

> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> My code should work, but it seems like there should but it seems like
> there should be a more elegant way to do this?
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> index 4615f62..6070c70 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
> @@ -1388,16 +1388,19 @@ int ftrace_profile_set_filter(struct perf_event *event, int event_id,
>  	struct event_filter *filter;
>  	struct filter_parse_state *ps;
>  	struct ftrace_event_call *call = NULL;
> +	int found = 0;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(call, &ftrace_events, list) {
> -		if (call->id == event_id)
> +		if (call->id == event_id) {
> +			found = 1;
>  			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	err = -EINVAL;
> -	if (!call)

	if (call == &ftrace_events)

-- Steve

> +	if (!found)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
>  	err = -EEXIST;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux