Greg KH schrieb:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:20PM +0100, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
>> From: Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Hi, here is a patch against /lib/kobject.c.
>>
>> No need to allocate more memory than usefull.
>> Here, we only need 12 (strlen("DEVPATH_OLD=")) + 1 (\0) extra bytes. This
>> saves 2 bytes !!! and improve readability IMO.
>
> Are you sure this really is even noticable anywhere? The memory is then
> freed, right? So no real memory savings happen here.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/kobject.c b/lib/kobject.c
>> index 0487d1f..958cc76 100644
>> --- a/lib/kobject.c
>> +++ b/lib/kobject.c
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ int kobject_rename(struct kobject *kobj, const char
>> *new_name)
>> error = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>
> Your patch is line-wrapped and the tabs converted to spaces, making it
> impossible to apply :(
>
>> }
>> - devpath_string = kmalloc(strlen(devpath) + 15, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + devpath_string = kmalloc(12 + strlen(devpath) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!devpath_string) {
>> error = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>>
>>
this is actualy done:
sprintf(devpath_string, "DEVPATH_OLD=%s", devpath);
i have seen something that works like asprintf()
devpath_string = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,"DEVPATH_OLD=%s",devpath);
just put it in place of the kmalloc
The interessting question is:
can devpath be manipulated to be VERY large at some point ?
@julia:
i did not check but i can imagine that the pattern
A=kmalloc() ... sprintf(a," ",b);
come up at some points inside the kernel since a lot of programmers
do not know about asprint().
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
