Steven Rostedt wrote:
Peter Zijlstra and I were doing a look over of places that assign
current->state = TASK_*INTERRUPTIBLE, by simply looking at places with:
$ git grep -A1 'state[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*TASK_[^R]'
and it seems there are quite a few places that looks like bugs. To be on
the safe side, everything outside of a run queue lock that sets the
current state to something other than TASK_RUNNING (or dead) should be
using set_current_state().
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule();
is probably OK, but it would not hurt to be consistent. Here's a few
examples of likely bugs:
[...]
This may be a bit off topic, but exactly which type of barrier should
set_current_state() be implying?
On MIPS, set_mb() (which is used by set_current_state()) has a full mb().
Some MIPS based processors have a much lighter weight wmb(). Could
wmb() be used in place of mb() here?
If not, an explanation of the required memory ordering semantics here
would be appreciated.
I know the documentation says:
set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of
current->state is correctly serialised wrt the caller's subsequent
test of whether to actually sleep:
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (do_i_need_to_sleep())
schedule();
Since the current CPU sees the memory accesses in order, what can be
happening on other CPUs that would require a full mb()?
Thanks,
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
