On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:03:42 +0200 (CEST), Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > +out_pdev: > > + platform_device_put(pdev); > > +out_gpio: > > + gpio_remove(&iocled->chip); > > I just noticed that the prototype of gpio_remove has __must_check > I don't think there is anything to check here; since the thing is not > fully initialized here, it is unlikely to be busy. Should there be (void) > in front of it? The void casting does not silence the warning. How about this? if (gpiochip_remove(&iocled->chip)) return; In general, memory leak would be less serious than crash or data corruption ;) --- Atsushi Nemoto -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
